ideas, thoughts, stories, reviews, on filmmaking, story concepts, and human conditioning. Caution: Read at your own risk.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Prop 29: People are Suffering NOW because they Can't Get Treatment
by Maureen Cruise, RN
Prop 29 will unfortunately probably pass no matter what ...Three people ..one MD, one JD and one TV writer ...separately ALL said the exact same thing to me...they "don't care if the money is burned " as long as the tobacco industry gets hurt. Must be a TV ad? .... depressing....
There is always a larger context.. to No on 29.
I am 100% for extra taxes on tobacco...but Prop 29 tax dollars belong to all the people of California. Public money should go to non profit public institutions for the public good. NOT to a group of unelected, unaccountable appointees in a program to spend almost a billion dollars of public money annually as they please, within some very broad guidelines. Prop 29's program cannot even be amended for 15 years...maybe never with a 2/3 of legislature requirement to amend.
Cancer research currently receives more federal tax dollars than any other disease, $5.4 billion in federal funding. Cancer, lung and cardiovascular diseases together net $8 billion dollars of federal money and receive additional private funding (LAT 4/27/12).
People are suffering because they can't get treatment.... cancer, lung disease, cardiovascular disease treatment ...without becoming bankrupt. We need money to give people healthcare services. It is the people's money and should go to unmet human needs.
Only 20% of the funding goes toward smoking cessation. The funds will dwindle if the prevention part of the program is successful...unless other sources are tapped.
We have information about cancer prevention. It is known that environmental toxins, certain pharmaceuticals, food additives, fossil fuels and chemicals are part of the cancer matrix along with some lifestyle choices. Environmental laws are being ignored by administrative agencies and drug are fast tracked bypassing safety considerations.. Our legislatures would not even ban BPA in baby bottles! BPA is ubiquitous in plastic food containers. We have knowledge about prevention that is ignored.
Prop 29 can outsource jobs, spend millions for over-priced expensive equipment and pay high salaries to people sitting behind desks, while actual healthcare services to people in dire need are being slashed. California's public health institutions funding has been decimated over the past 20 years. ...shuttering the major public health information centers for disseminating prevention information to millions of people.
$ 800 million dollars could be used to expand much needed access to medical services and generate thousands of jobs right here and NOW. We need jobs and we need healthcare. Tax money should go toward alleviating current problems and serve the most urgent needs of California's residents. Investment should be for jobs and access to treatment here in our state.
As LAT reported (4/27/12) " California can't afford to retain its K-12 teachers, keep all its parks open, give public college students the courses they need to earn a degree or provide adequate home health aides for the infirm or medical care for the poor." Now is not the time for billions spent on research. We need healthcare here and now.
Be Well,
Maureen Cruise RN
Prop 29 will unfortunately probably pass no matter what ...Three people ..one MD, one JD and one TV writer ...separately ALL said the exact same thing to me...they "don't care if the money is burned " as long as the tobacco industry gets hurt. Must be a TV ad? .... depressing....
There is always a larger context.. to No on 29.
I am 100% for extra taxes on tobacco...but Prop 29 tax dollars belong to all the people of California. Public money should go to non profit public institutions for the public good. NOT to a group of unelected, unaccountable appointees in a program to spend almost a billion dollars of public money annually as they please, within some very broad guidelines. Prop 29's program cannot even be amended for 15 years...maybe never with a 2/3 of legislature requirement to amend.
Cancer research currently receives more federal tax dollars than any other disease, $5.4 billion in federal funding. Cancer, lung and cardiovascular diseases together net $8 billion dollars of federal money and receive additional private funding (LAT 4/27/12).
People are suffering because they can't get treatment.... cancer, lung disease, cardiovascular disease treatment ...without becoming bankrupt. We need money to give people healthcare services. It is the people's money and should go to unmet human needs.
Only 20% of the funding goes toward smoking cessation. The funds will dwindle if the prevention part of the program is successful...unless other sources are tapped.
We have information about cancer prevention. It is known that environmental toxins, certain pharmaceuticals, food additives, fossil fuels and chemicals are part of the cancer matrix along with some lifestyle choices. Environmental laws are being ignored by administrative agencies and drug are fast tracked bypassing safety considerations.. Our legislatures would not even ban BPA in baby bottles! BPA is ubiquitous in plastic food containers. We have knowledge about prevention that is ignored.
Prop 29 can outsource jobs, spend millions for over-priced expensive equipment and pay high salaries to people sitting behind desks, while actual healthcare services to people in dire need are being slashed. California's public health institutions funding has been decimated over the past 20 years. ...shuttering the major public health information centers for disseminating prevention information to millions of people.
$ 800 million dollars could be used to expand much needed access to medical services and generate thousands of jobs right here and NOW. We need jobs and we need healthcare. Tax money should go toward alleviating current problems and serve the most urgent needs of California's residents. Investment should be for jobs and access to treatment here in our state.
As LAT reported (4/27/12) " California can't afford to retain its K-12 teachers, keep all its parks open, give public college students the courses they need to earn a degree or provide adequate home health aides for the infirm or medical care for the poor." Now is not the time for billions spent on research. We need healthcare here and now.
Be Well,
Maureen Cruise RN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2015
(10)
- ► December 2015 (1)
- ► November 2015 (2)
- ► October 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (2)
- ► August 2015 (1)
- ► January 2015 (1)
-
►
2014
(23)
- ► December 2014 (7)
- ► October 2014 (1)
- ► March 2014 (5)
- ► February 2014 (2)
- ► January 2014 (5)
-
►
2013
(11)
- ► December 2013 (1)
- ► November 2013 (1)
- ► October 2013 (1)
- ► September 2013 (3)
- ► August 2013 (1)
- ► April 2013 (1)
-
▼
2012
(23)
- ► November 2012 (4)
- ► October 2012 (1)
- ► September 2012 (3)
- ► August 2012 (1)
- ► April 2012 (1)
- ► March 2012 (3)
- ► February 2012 (1)
- ► January 2012 (4)
-
►
2011
(12)
- ► December 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (1)
- ► August 2011 (2)
- ► April 2011 (3)
- ► February 2011 (2)
- ► January 2011 (3)
-
►
2010
(9)
- ► December 2010 (1)
- ► November 2010 (2)
- ► August 2010 (1)
- ► April 2010 (1)
- ► January 2010 (3)
-
►
2009
(21)
- ► December 2009 (1)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (5)
- ► August 2009 (4)
- ► April 2009 (3)
- ► March 2009 (2)
-
►
2008
(23)
- ► October 2008 (2)
- ► August 2008 (1)
- ► April 2008 (1)
- ► February 2008 (5)
- ► January 2008 (7)
-
►
2007
(18)
- ► December 2007 (4)
- ► September 2007 (1)
- ► August 2007 (1)
- ► April 2007 (4)
Popular Posts
-
Yes there are way more films released than any one person can possibly see. But there are 7 billion people in the world. Perhaps there are...
-
Leaving Las Vegas (1995) John O’Brien (novel) Mike Figgis (screenplay and director) with Nicolas Cage and Elizabeth Shue Scene INT....
-
SE: Jon first off I want to thank you for this opportunity to gain insight into the life and methods of a renown working screenwriter. JR...
-
Yes? Is this Larry? Who's calling? I'm Wendy Ferguson, with Mutual Applied Assistance Care. We show you listed at 458 Temple ...
-
Full Movie:
-
That was you? Hey, I was just having some fun man. You busted open a major corporation. It must be worth billions. What'd they ev...
-
Originally posted on the Black List Title: A Serious Man [download a PDF version of the script here ]. Year: 2009 Writing Credits:...
-
You look familiar. You come here often? What? Are you kidding? No. Seriously. It's like a deja vu or something. Does that line ever ...