ideas, thoughts, stories, reviews, on filmmaking, story concepts, and human conditioning. Caution: Read at your own risk.
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Who Needs Hollwood? Not these guys.
There's a new movement in filmmaking. It's what you might call a "who need's Hollywood?", DIY approach. A number of new filmmakers have had some awesome success with this. The thing is there is no one way for everybody. Each filmmaker seems to find their own road. But there are some commonalities, like social networking, self-distribution, and audience interaction, and always hard work.
Arin Crumley and Susan Buice successfully produced, directed and distributed their feature film, Four Eyed Monsters, through the internet and a lot of Google time. One thing about this is that technology moves so fast, and things are ever changing, so that what worked for them is already outdated. But their independent spirit in going down their own road, even paving their way through a wilderness, was the thing we can all take away from their experience and apply to ourselves. By the way, Four Eyed monsters garnered two Independent Spirit Award nominations.
The road they took started with vlogs on YouTube. I think they planned this as part of their strategy in marketing their film. Their vlogs were about the behind the scenes "making of" stuff that you might find in typical DVD extras. But there is nothing typical about these guys. The film itself was kind of a similar docudrama of their relationship, much of it in a vlog fourth wall style. That sounds a bit repugnant on paper. But the film is really beautiful. Check out the trailer to get a feel for it. So while the film was about their relationship's birth, life and death, as the tagline reads, the vlogs were about that too, along with the making of the film and with more reality.
The interesting this is that their "making of" experience is like none you've ever seen, or maybe never will. They forged their way to gather a YouTube and social network audience, which they translated into theatrical sales, by capturing emails and zip codes and persuading theaters across the country to show their film during four Thursdays September in 2005, I think it was. That itself is quite an accomplishment. But it doesn't end there. in fact it still hasn't ended.
They acquired support form a number of online web film distributor ventures, including YouTube, where they were the first online feature release, and Spout.com, who paid them a dollar for everyone who they referred to Spout, amounting to $35,000. Their vlogs were so popular that they included them as a series of episodes on the DVD, along with the film and a soundtrack CD. The DVD has sold around 1500 copies through their website, mainly. Now they are talking to DVD distributors and I think they are available at Borders and maybe on a cable movie channel in the future.
This is backwards from what the conventional Hollywood big business model professes. In that model, you never release to the DVD market and certainly not the internet, until you have exploited the theatrical market. Not these guys. They offered their film for free on YouTube, along with the vlog episodes, which built interest for the DVD and generated the theatrical and DVD markets.
I've heard filmmakers worry about exposing their film like this, as a quick way to kill all chances for conventional distribution. but what Arin is saying is that conventional distribution is a pipe dream. Susan calls it the prince with the glass slipper. This is so true, and so obvious, it's amazing filmmakers haven't seen this before. We are wasting our time submitting to festival after festival, where are chances are a few hundred out of 5000 to 6000 for the big festivals. Even if we have a good film, and even if it;s picked up by a festival, the chances of finding a distributor this way are so remote. There are usually one or two film at any festival, if that, that get a distribution deal. Then what? Our films are shelved. We don't have to accept this treatment.
Like Arin and Susan we have the greatest marketing tool at our fingertips, and it's free. The internet. Lance Weller and some others have a website, WorkBookProject.com, where these kinds of things are discussed openly. You'd be surprised at how many filmmakers are finding audiences this way.
Here are some websites to check out:
FourEyedMonsters.com
WorkBookProject.com
Spout.com
YouTube Screening Room
Blip.tv
IndieGoGo
BraveNewTheaters.com
At these sites you'll find a lot more links.
Check out my own venture at OutInTheStreetFilms.com, and my film project, Stop War.
Saturday, June 21, 2008
The Poker House: This film is amazing
I do think it will be hard to sell. I predict it will go to DVD as do most festival features. It's a shame because this film deserves a theatrical release. Like I expected, the woman's perspective from writer-director Lori Petty is so original and refreshing.
The big problem with distribution is the same thing that makes this a great film, it's subject matter; that being the story of three young girls growing up in a poker house with a hooker mother and an abusive pimp along with their seedy associates. People don't want to hear that films like this are playing at the cineplex. They don't want to know what really goes on in America.
I was discussing this film with someone who mentioned Memoirs of a Geisha in comparison, which got me to thinking about how Geishas are highly respected and trained as in a profession. But in the US people in this business deal with drugs, guns, pimps and violence. It's one of the most outrageous saddest state of affairs that plague American society, and the reason is because it is illegal in most every state, forcing it into the hands of underworld unscrupulous characters.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(3)
- ► April 2016 (1)
-
►
2015
(10)
- ► December 2015 (1)
- ► November 2015 (2)
- ► October 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (2)
- ► August 2015 (1)
- ► January 2015 (1)
-
►
2014
(23)
- ► December 2014 (7)
- ► October 2014 (1)
- ► March 2014 (5)
- ► February 2014 (2)
- ► January 2014 (5)
-
►
2013
(11)
- ► December 2013 (1)
- ► November 2013 (1)
- ► October 2013 (1)
- ► September 2013 (3)
- ► August 2013 (1)
- ► April 2013 (1)
-
►
2012
(23)
- ► November 2012 (4)
- ► October 2012 (1)
- ► September 2012 (3)
- ► August 2012 (1)
- ► April 2012 (1)
- ► March 2012 (3)
- ► February 2012 (1)
- ► January 2012 (4)
-
►
2011
(12)
- ► December 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (1)
- ► August 2011 (2)
- ► April 2011 (3)
- ► February 2011 (2)
- ► January 2011 (3)
-
►
2010
(9)
- ► December 2010 (1)
- ► November 2010 (2)
- ► August 2010 (1)
- ► April 2010 (1)
- ► January 2010 (3)
-
►
2009
(21)
- ► December 2009 (1)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (5)
- ► August 2009 (4)
- ► April 2009 (3)
- ► March 2009 (2)
-
►
2008
(23)
- ► October 2008 (2)
- ► August 2008 (1)
- ► April 2008 (1)
- ► February 2008 (5)
- ► January 2008 (7)
-
►
2007
(18)
- ► December 2007 (4)
- ► September 2007 (1)
- ► August 2007 (1)
- ► April 2007 (4)
Popular Posts
-
Leaving Las Vegas (1995) John O’Brien (novel) Mike Figgis (screenplay and director) with Nicolas Cage and Elizabeth Shue Scene INT....
-
That was you? Hey, I was just having some fun man. You busted open a major corporation. It must be worth billions. What'd they ev...
-
Yes there are way more films released than any one person can possibly see. But there are 7 billion people in the world. Perhaps there are...
-
Yes? Is this Larry? Who's calling? I'm Wendy Ferguson, with Mutual Applied Assistance Care. We show you listed at 458 Temple ...
-
Originally posted on the Black List Title: A Serious Man [download a PDF version of the script here ]. Year: 2009 Writing Credits:...
-
Full Movie:
-
SE: Jon first off I want to thank you for this opportunity to gain insight into the life and methods of a renown working screenwriter. JR...
-
The Scott Hatteberg walk off scene. This is a very typical sports underdog makes good scene, with a winning move at the climax of the m...